Klar, D., Aplt. v. Dairy Farmers of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because “the petitioner did not receive [] notice before the officers broke the door to invade his home, the arrest was unlawful and the evidence seized should have been suppressed”
• holding that when state peace officers arrest a person for violation of federal narcotics law, “the lawfulness of the arrest without warrant is to be determined by reference to state law”
• holding that because “the petitioner did not receive that notice before the officers broke the door to invade his home, the arrest was unlawful, and the evidence seized should have been suppressed”
• holding that when state peace officers arrest a person for violation of federal narcotics law, “the law- fulness of the arrest without warrant is to be determined by reference to state law”
• holding that because “the petitioner did not receive that notice before the officers broke the door to invade his home, the arrest was unlawful, and the evidence seized should have been suppressed”
• suggesting that officers announced their presence too quietly to satisfy the purposes of the rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).