Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 10/4/1972
Commonwealth v. Porter
Citations
- 449 Pa. 153
- 295 A.2d 311
- 1972 Pa. LEXIS 359
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- statements possessed the requisite indicia of reliability which derived from being spontaneous and against the penal interest of the declarants
- statements possessed the requisite indicia of reliability which derived from being spontaneous and against the penal interest of the declarants
- statements of co-conspirators made after initial assault on the victim but before final assault were held to be within the co-conspirator exception; the conspiracy was not complete.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Bell, Barbieri
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. CocciolettiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-02-04· cited 130×
- Commonwealth v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-04-24· cited 119×
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-12-22· cited 106×
- Commonwealth v. WebsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-03· cited 102×
- Commonwealth v. StarkesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-03-18· cited 94×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-17· cited 65×
- Commonwealth v. EwellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-05-02· cited 47×
- Commonwealth v. HaagSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-07-10· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-11-22· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. ScarboroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-04-29· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. StantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-01-29· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. RiggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-30· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. GarritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-11-14· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. CullSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-03-28· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. McDowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-03-18· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. BujanowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-08-07· cited 16×
- United States v. Sam Lee Fowler, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 1973-04-04· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. GallowaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-01-26· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. CarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-12-31· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. FaraciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-09-30· cited 11×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- California v. GreenSupreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court· 1970-12-15· cited 1,926×
- Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1972-03-21· cited 1,324×
- People v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-12-28· cited 217×
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-01-05· cited 76×
- Commonwealth v. PearsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-09-26· cited 67×
- Commonwealth v. MosesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-12-31· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. EllsworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-01-08· cited 45×
- Commonwealth v. RansomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-03-20· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. MeasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1964-07-01· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. HarmonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-10-09· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-01-26· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-06-28· cited 31×
- Commonwealth v. CrosbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-06-28· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.