Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 3/20/1972
Commonwealth v. Ransom
Citations
- 446 Pa. 457
- 288 A.2d 762
- 1972 Pa. LEXIS 314
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- admission, through testimony of police officer, of accomplices’ custodial statements implicating defendant, where accomplices were tried separately from defendant and did not testify at defendant’s trial, violated defendant’s confrontation rights under Douglas
- admission, through testimony of police officer, of accomplices' custodial statements implicating defendant, where accomplices were tried separately from defendant and did not testify at defendant's trial, violated defendant's confrontation rights under Douglas
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Bell, Barbieri
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-01-26· cited 730×
- Commonwealth v. CocciolettiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-02-04· cited 130×
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-12-22· cited 106×
- Commonwealth v. MayhueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-03-18· cited 87×
- Commonwealth v. McCloudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-07-29· cited 67×
- Commonwealth v. PorterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-10-04· cited 50×
- Commonwealth v. SampsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-11-26· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. RomeroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-01-05· cited 47×
- Commonwealth v. WitherspoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-05· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. ScarboroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-04-29· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. PassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-01-29· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. CarterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-10-29· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. CullSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-03-28· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. McDowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-03-18· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. TolbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-01-19· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. BujanowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-08-07· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-02-28· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. GallowaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-01-26· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. HubbleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-04-29· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. KennedySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-10-19· cited 8×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- California v. GreenSupreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 2,732×
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 1,939×
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court· 1970-12-15· cited 1,926×
- Roberts v. RussellSupreme Court· 1968-10-14· cited 668×
- Commonwealth v. PadgettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-01-09· cited 111×
- Commonwealth v. CammSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-05-13· cited 96×
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-01-05· cited 76×
- Commonwealth v. EllsworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-01-08· cited 45×
- Gaskins CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-04-24· cited 43×
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-06-28· cited 31×
- Sam Hoover v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsFifth Circuit· 1971-03-09· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. HollowaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-04-16· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1969-06-27· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.