Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Peterson

Citations

  • 596 A.2d 172
  • 408 Pa. Super. 22
  • 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2503

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[e]xigent circumstances can be generated when evidence sought to be preserved is likely to be destroyed or secreted from investigation . . ..”
  • finding that squatter could not claim Fourth Amendment right to privacy in abandoned structure
  • in opinion affirming the warrantless search of an uninhabitable abandoned store front, dissenting judge and concurring judge agreed that if the abandoned store front had been a shelter for the homeless, privacy rights should have attached
  • in opinion affirming the warrantless search of an uninhabitable abandoned store front, dissenting judge and concurring judge agreed that if the abandoned store front had been a shelter for the homeless, privacy rights should have attached

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beck, Popovich, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

72 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.