Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 8/19/1991
Commonwealth v. Peterson
Citations
- 596 A.2d 172
- 408 Pa. Super. 22
- 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2503
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[e]xigent circumstances can be generated when evidence sought to be preserved is likely to be destroyed or secreted from investigation . . ..”
- finding that squatter could not claim Fourth Amendment right to privacy in abandoned structure
- in opinion affirming the warrantless search of an uninhabitable abandoned store front, dissenting judge and concurring judge agreed that if the abandoned store front had been a shelter for the homeless, privacy rights should have attached
- in opinion affirming the warrantless search of an uninhabitable abandoned store front, dissenting judge and concurring judge agreed that if the abandoned store front had been a shelter for the homeless, privacy rights should have attached
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beck, Popovich, Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. MelendezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-05-22· cited 195×
- Commonwealth v. MillnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-12-28· cited 122×
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Enimpah, A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-12-29· cited 106×
- Commonwealth v. PetersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-11-05· cited 89×
- Commonwealth v. GovensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-10-28· cited 63×
- Commonwealth v. ArnoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-08-21· cited 37×
- Whiting v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-11-08· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-10-15· cited 23×
- Commonwealth v. GlassSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-09-15· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. MettsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-12-06· cited 14×
- State v. CleatorCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-09-07· cited 10×
- People v. HernerNew York Supreme Court· 1993-01-26· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. GordonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-03-15· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. FlowersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-07-15· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. MullinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-07-06· cited 1×
- People v. Van HoutenNew York County Courts· 1998-04-29
- Commonwealth v. GovensPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1992-04-27
Cites
72 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 8,014×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1886-02-01· cited 3,820×
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court· 1977-06-21· cited 2,561×
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 2,425×
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 2,305×
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-04-17· cited 1,923×
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 1,879×
- McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-12-20· cited 1,736×
- Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,715×
- Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 1,576×
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court· 1978-05-23· cited 1,428×
- California v. CiraoloSupreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 1,253×
- Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 1,202×
- Blystone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1990-02-28· cited 551×
- Robbins v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 503×
- Commonwealth v. SellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-30· cited 268×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.