Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 11/6/2014

Commonwealth v. Parker

Citations

104 A.3d 17
2014 Pa. Super. 253
2014 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3958
2014 WL 5765394

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Appellant “waived his objection to the jury instructions because he failed to object after the jury had been charged.”
Holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by permitting a witness’s prior inconsistent statement to be sent back with jury during its deliberation
observing that specific objection to testimony as hearsay is waived on appeal if not preserved at trial
observing that specific objection to testimony as hearsay is waived on appeal if not preserved at trial
emphasizing that where the substance of a communication, e.g., a question, contains an implied assertion and is offered for the truth of the matter asserted, it is hearsay and generally inadmissible
holding submission and subsequent denial of proposed points inconsistent with given jury instructions will not preserve issue even where counsel objected to charge at charging conference where no objection lodged to actual instruction given

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Olson, Ott, Stabile

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.