Com. v. Fitzpatrick, J., III

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Annemarie’s note both satisfied the state of mind hearsay exception, and thus could be admitted as substantive evidence, while simultaneously finding that the note was not offered for the truth of the matter asserted therein
• deeming erroneous admission of victim's email harmless given overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt supplied by properly admitted evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Commonwealth v. Fitzpatrick III, J., Aplt.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-07-23

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-10-06· cited 387×
• Commonwealth v. Cooper
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-12-28· cited 175×
• Commonwealth v. Moore
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-12-28· cited 131×
• Commonwealth v. Thornton
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-07-02· cited 113×
• Commonwealth v. Laich
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-08-17· cited 107×
• Commonwealth v. Parker
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-11-06· cited 106×
• Commonwealth v. Luster
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-07-23· cited 104×
• Commonwealth v. Puksar
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-11-01· cited 98×
• Commonwealth v. Levanduski
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-08-02· cited 98×
• Commonwealth v. Walter
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-02-18· cited 94×
• Commonwealth v. Green
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-09-04· cited 60×
• Commonwealth v. Kunkle
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-11-06· cited 43×
• Com. v. Fitzpatrick, J., III
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-04-12· cited 42×