Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1/4/1993
Commonwealth v. Parker
Citations
- 619 A.2d 735
- 422 Pa. Super. 393
- 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an officer's ongoing detention of a driver stopped for a moving violation, even after the officer had finished issuing a traffic citation, constituted an improper seizure absent articulable grounds to suspect criminal activity
- state appellate courts are not bound by federal courts' conclusions of law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beck, Johnson, Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. ReppertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-10· cited 239×
- Commonwealth v. Abdul-SalaamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-06-18· cited 90×
- Commonwealth v. PhinnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-10-16· cited 80×
- Commonwealth v. ViallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-12-30· cited 57×
- Commonwealth v. SierraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-01-06· cited 48×
- Commonwealth v. BoringSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-08-23· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. PalmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-08-04· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. YedinakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-04-11· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. WrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-02-26· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. RosenfeltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-07-11· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. McElroySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-08-18· cited 30×
- Frey v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-11-08· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-12-08· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. HoakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-08-12· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. WrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-08-29· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. TalleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-11-22· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. VasquezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-10-28· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. AltadonnaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-02-13· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-06-27· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. MurphySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-03-22· cited 17×
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court· 1974-01-08· cited 3,415×
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 3,218×
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 3,147×
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,277×
- Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court· 1987-03-03· cited 1,525×
- Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 1,484×
- Walter v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 793×
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-02-04· cited 776×
- United States v. Van LeeuwenSupreme Court· 1970-04-27· cited 399×
- Commonwealth v. SellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-30· cited 268×
- United States v. TurkFifth Circuit· 1976-01-29· cited 128×
- Commonwealth v. LopezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-05-14· cited 124×
- Commonwealth v. MelilliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-13· cited 121×
- Commonwealth v. BeaufordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-11-29· cited 83×
- Commonwealth v. TrengeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-10-01· cited 82×
- Commonwealth v. LemanskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-07-20· cited 76×
- Commonwealth v. TimkoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-07-24· cited 73×
- Commonwealth v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-12-21· cited 60×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.