Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Morrow

Citations

  • 650 A.2d 907
  • 437 Pa. Super. 584
  • 1994 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3584

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that there was sufficient evidence to sustain appellant’s conviction for possession with intent to deliver where appellant sold marijuana to an informant, who subsequently turned the marijuana over to the police
  • violation of Section 780-113(a)(3) “does not require that a party make a profit, it simply prohibits ‘delivery’” of controlled substances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beck, Hudock, Brosky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.