Skip to main content
· 10/6/1977

Commonwealth v. Clawson

Citations

  • 378 A.2d 1008
  • 250 Pa. Super. 422
  • 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2523

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • jury should have been permitted to consider defendant’s testimony as it related to the defense of entrapment
  • plurality opinion by Spaeth, J.
  • plurality opinion by Spaeth, J.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth, Van Voort

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.