· 10/6/1977
Commonwealth v. Clawson
Citations
- 378 A.2d 1008
- 250 Pa. Super. 422
- 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2523
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- jury should have been permitted to consider defendant’s testimony as it related to the defense of entrapment
- plurality opinion by Spaeth, J.
- plurality opinion by Spaeth, J.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spaeth, Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth, Van Voort
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.