Commonwealth v. Hess

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suppression not necessary where prosecution provided access to evidence regarding vehicles and defendant able to introduce his own expert testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Thur
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-08-04· cited 289×
• Commonwealth v. Santiago
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-08-28· cited 90×
• Commonwealth v. Smith
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-09-23· cited 28×
• Commonwealth v. Spano
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-07-01· cited 5×
• Commonwealth v. Long
  Bucks County Court of Common Pleas· 2008-09-12

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wong Sun v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
• Oregon v. Elstad
  Supreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,824×
• Michigan v. Tucker
  Supreme Court· 1974-06-10· cited 1,437×
• Commonwealth v. Prosdocimo
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-08-17· cited 136×
• Commonwealth v. Hudson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-05-30· cited 128×
• Commonwealth v. Ragan
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-07-29· cited 111×
• Commonwealth v. Scott
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-10-17· cited 54×
• Commonwealth v. Metzer
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-11-24· cited 44×
• Commonwealth v. Polston
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-11-10· cited 34×
• Commonwealth v. Nauman
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-09-13· cited 25×
• Commonwealth v. Morrow
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-12-08· cited 24×