Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Knowles

Citations

  • 540 A.2d 938
  • 373 Pa. Super. 203
  • 1988 Pa. Super. LEXIS 676

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • A cut off point of .250% was not an abuse of discretion and serves the purpose of ARD
  • A cut off point of .250% was not an abuse of discretion and serves the purpose of ARD
  • cut-off point of .250% served the purpose of ARD
  • cut-off point of .250% served the purpose of ARD

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cirillo, Brosky, Beck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.