Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 5/1/2003

Commonwealth v. Morris

Citations

822 A.2d 684
573 Pa. 157

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that claims of PCRA counsel’s ineffectiveness do not save an otherwise untimely PCRA petition
stating that claims of PCRA counsel's ineffectiveness do not save an otherwise untimely PCRA petition
providing that “a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel does not save an otherwise untimely petition for review on the merits”
holding information that was clearly available to [the a]ppellant at the time of trial cannot be cloaked as a claim of governmental interference to circumvent the PCRA timeliness requirements
holding information that was clearly available to [the a]p-pellant at the time of trial cannot be cloaked as a claim of governmental interference to circumvent the PCRA timeliness requirements
stating that “questions of timeliness [of PCRA petitions] are jurisdictional threshold questions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cappy, Zappala, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor, Former, Flaherty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.