Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Roane

Citations

  • 142 A.3d 79
  • 2016 Pa. Super. 124
  • 2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 325
  • 2016 WL 3343488

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the failure to satisfy any prong of the ineffectiveness test defeats an ineffectiveness claim
  • stating that an appellant’s failure to satisfy any prong of the ineffectiveness test requires rejection of the claim
  • indicating Appellant asked trial counsel to present alibi evidence at trial
  • \The fact that a petitioner presents a new argument or advances a new theory in support of a previously litigated issue will not circumvent the previous litigation bar.\
  • “A PCRA court’s credibility findings are to be accorded great deference[.]”
  • where the appellant’s principal brief was 122 pages in length, stating that the Court would consider the issues on their merits because counsel had filed a petition requesting permission to exceed the brief’s maximum word count and page limit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Elliott, Musmanno

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.