Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Martin

Citations

  • 611 A.2d 731
  • 416 Pa. Super. 507
  • 1992 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \a claim of excessiveness . . . does not constitute a substantial question when the sentence in question is within the statutory limits\
  • sentencing court is in best position to view defendant’s character, display of remorse, indifference, and general nature of crime
  • ratifying a trial court’s upward departure from the “advisory” sentencing guidelines
  • ratifying a trial court’s upward departure from the “advisory” sentencing guidelines

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Olszewski, Kelly, Brosky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.