Commonwealth v. Hoag

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appeilant is Lt I I entitled to \volume discount\ by having sentences run concurre.ntly
• holding that the imposition of consecutive sentences following convictions for multiple criminal acts that arose out of one larger criminal transaction does not raise a substantial question, as a defendant is not entitled to a \volume discount\ for his crimes
• holding that the imposition of consecutive sentences following convictions for multiple criminal acts that arose out of one larger criminal transaction does not raise a substantial question, as a defendant is not entitled to a “volume discount” for his crimes
• holding that a defendant is not entitled to a volume discount for multiple convictions
• holding that appellant is not entitled to “volume discount” by having sentences run concurrently
• explaining that a defendant is not entitled to a “volume discount” for his or her crimes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).