Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 8/7/2003

Commonwealth v. Anderson

Citations

830 A.2d 1013
2003 Pa. Super. 290
2003 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2335

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that “if an appellant fails to comply with Pa.R.A.P. 2119(f) and the Commonwealth objects, the issue is waived for purposes of review.”
noting that a challenge to the court’s consideration of improper factors at sentencing refers to the discretionary aspects of sentencing
finding that when an appellant fails to include a Rule 2119(f) statement in an appellate brief, and the Commonwealth has not objected, this Court can overlook the omission and review the issue if a substantial question is evident from appellant’s brief
stating claim that court considered improper factors at sentencing refers to discretionary aspects of sentencing
stating claim that court considered improper factors at sentencing refers to discretionary aspects of sentencing
stating claim that court considered improper factors at sentencing refers to discretionary aspects of sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Todd, Graci, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.