Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 4/11/1995
Commonwealth v. Byrd
Citations
- 657 A.2d 961
- 441 Pa. Super. 351
- 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 886
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing a sentence outside the guidelines where the trial court erroneously stated it had imposed an aggravated range sentence and did not provide reasons to support deviation from the guidelines
- appellant was not entitled to PCRA relief for appellate counsel’s failure to raise certain issues in a PAA because appellate counsel reviewed the record and determined that those issues were meritless
- appeal to Pennsylvania Supreme Court not matter of right but of sound judicial discretion
- appeal to Pennsylvania Supreme Court not matter of right but of sound judicial discretion
- judgment of sentence vacated where sentencing court failed to state, in defendant’s presence, permissible range of guideline sentences and did not indicate it was sentencing defendant outside of guidelines or provide reasons for deviation
- contention that court failed to give sufficient consideration to defendant’s use of his incarceration time to improve his education, his use of the Salvation Army programming, and his mastery of his anger did not raise substantial question
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cavanaugh, Johnson, and Saylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. RoddaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-01-07· cited 199×
- Commonwealth v. LiebelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-06-09· cited 147×
- Commonwealth v. Garcia-RiveraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-11-05· cited 92×
- Com. v. Beatty, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-02-04· cited 50×
- Commonwealth v. PaddenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-08-23· cited 47×
- Commonwealth v. WagnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-11-13· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. CampionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-02-29· cited 21×
- Prol v. ProlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-12-18· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. EllisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-06-03· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. HillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-10-19· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. HennelDelaware County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-05-26
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-03-10· cited 739×
- Commonwealth v. RoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-27· cited 83×
- Commonwealth v. KorenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-08-25· cited 74×
- Commonwealth v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-22· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. TannerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-12-06· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-02-23· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. BreterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-05-17· cited 10×
- Commonwealth v. DanielsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-09-22· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. GilbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-08-12· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.