Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Byrd

Citations

  • 657 A.2d 961
  • 441 Pa. Super. 351
  • 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 886

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing a sentence outside the guidelines where the trial court erroneously stated it had imposed an aggravated range sentence and did not provide reasons to support deviation from the guidelines
  • appellant was not entitled to PCRA relief for appellate counsel’s failure to raise certain issues in a PAA because appellate counsel reviewed the record and determined that those issues were meritless
  • appeal to Pennsylvania Supreme Court not matter of right but of sound judicial discretion
  • appeal to Pennsylvania Supreme Court not matter of right but of sound judicial discretion
  • judgment of sentence vacated where sentencing court failed to state, in defendant’s presence, permissible range of guideline sentences and did not indicate it was sentencing defendant outside of guidelines or provide reasons for deviation
  • contention that court failed to give sufficient consideration to defendant’s use of his incarceration time to improve his education, his use of the Salvation Army programming, and his mastery of his anger did not raise substantial question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanaugh, Johnson, and Saylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.