Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 7/20/2006

Commonwealth v. Little

Citations

903 A.2d 1269
2006 Pa. Super. 186
2006 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1643

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

constitutional challenges must be raised and preserved at trial and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal
claim of statute’s unconstitutionality must be raised and preserved at trial and cannot be raised for first time on appeal
“appellate review of [a ruling on] suppression is limited to examination of the precise basis under which suppression initially was sought; no new theories of relief may be considered on appeal.”
“appellate review of an order denying suppression is limited to examination of the precise basis under which suppression initially was sought; no new theories of relief may be considered on appeal”
“[A]ppellate review of [a ruling on] suppression is limited to examination of the precise basis under which suppression initially was sought; no new theories of relief may be considered on appeal.”
“[A]ppellate review of an order denying suppression is limited to examination of the precise basis under which suppression initially was sought; no new theories of relief may be considered on appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevens, McCaffery, Panella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.