Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/2/2015

Commonwealth v. Freeman

Citations

128 A.3d 1231
2015 Pa. Super. 252
2015 Pa. Super. LEXIS 783
2015 WL 7756864

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that appellant waived his challenge to the weight of the evidence where his Rule 1925(b
explaining that the failure to develop a legal argument in support of a claim results in waiver of the issue
reiterating that “[t]he failure to develop an adequate argument in an appellate brief may result in waiver of the claim under Pa.R.A.P. 2119”
stating that “suppression motions … must be made with specificity and particularity as to the evidence sought to be suppressed and the reasons for the suppression”
finding waiver of appellant's sufficiency and weight challenges where the Pa.R.A.P. 1925 statement was too vague to permit the court to identify (1
finding the appellant’s claim waived for failing to comply with 8 J-S33014-20 requirements of Pa.R.A.P. 2119

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Panella, Wecht, Strassburger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.