Commonwealth v. Doyen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that this Court will not review not properly developed in briefs
• finding state trooper’s testimony regarding drug dealers’ coded language appropriate expert testimony
• “the coded and encrypted language utilized by drug traffickers” is an appropriate subject for expert testimony
• although appellant challenged admission of wiretap evidence in pre- trial suppression motion, failure to raise specific challenge to authenticity of particular judge’s signature precluded him from raising such challenge for first time on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).