Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 7/14/1978
Commonwealth v. Stokes
Citations
- 389 A.2d 74
- 480 Pa. 38
- 1978 Pa. LEXIS 783
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- [holding] it is well settled that the uncorroborated confession of an accomplice which implicates the suspect will supply the probable cause for an arrest warrant
- victim and eyewitness information regarding the commission of a crime sufficient to establish probable cause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino, Larsen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. LovetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-10-05· cited 211×
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-09-22· cited 163×
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-12-20· cited 107×
- Commonwealth v. ZookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-17· cited 102×
- State v. MontigueOregon Supreme Court· 1980-01-22· cited 67×
- Commonwealth v. WeidenmoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-04-04· cited 53×
- Commonwealth v. MossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-05-20· cited 43×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-05-08· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-01-16· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-05-06· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. SimmonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-01-29· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-05-11· cited 33×
- Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-05-27· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. PlusquellicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-08-06· cited 30×
- Waldrop v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-11-23· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. PytakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-06-20· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-01-29· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. ThranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-05-02· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. GeorgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-06-27· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. GloverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-03-20· cited 24×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-03-28· cited 4,796×
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-01-26· cited 3,191×
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-06-10· cited 3,146×
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1971-06-28· cited 1,806×
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1967-04-24· cited 1,521×
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-07-01· cited 156×
- Commonwealth v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-12-29· cited 132×
- Commonwealth v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-10-12· cited 119×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-04-07· cited 107×
- Betrand AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-04-13· cited 106×
- Commonwealth v. BradleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-09-07· cited 101×
- Commonwealth v. KenneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-11-30· cited 101×
- Commonwealth v. MamonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-11-17· cited 82×
- Commonwealth v. RichardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-10-16· cited 72×
- Commonwealth v. CrawleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1966-11-17· cited 68×
- United States v. Herman P. Unger, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 1973-01-02· cited 58×
- United States v. Thurlester WilsonSeventh Circuit· 1973-05-23· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-05-23· cited 47×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.