United States ex rel. Brink v. Claudy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a cause of action, as a whole, must satisfy the predominance requirement of (b)(3) and that “[a] district court cannot manufacture predominance through the nimble use of subdivision (e)(4)”
• “the named Plaintiffs ... seek immediate compensation for past and future damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).