Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Robinson

Citations

  • 7 A.3d 868
  • 2010 Pa. Super. 192
  • 2010 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3262
  • 2010 WL 4111567

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a claim that “the trial court fail[ed] to make a statutorily required determination regarding a defendant‟s eligibility for an RRRI minimum sentence as required” constitutes “a non-waivable challenge to the legality of [his] sentence”
  • indicating that when “the trial court fails to make a statutorily required determination regarding a defendant’s eligibility for an RRRI minimum sentence as required, the sentence is illegal”
  • reiterating that issue concerning court’s power to impose given sentence implicates legality of sentence; sentencing code requires court to impose maximum and minimum sentence of confinement per 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9756
  • stating: “[t]his Court has held that an attack upon the power of a court to impose a given sentence is a challenge to the legality of a sentence”
  • holding RRRI-eligibility claims are not subject to waiver
  • claim alleging that trial court failed to make statutorily required determination regarding defendant’s eligibility for RRRI minimum sentence presents non-waivable challenge to legality of sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gantman, Shogan, Mundy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.