Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Sullivan

Citations

  • 581 A.2d 956
  • 399 Pa. Super. 124
  • 1990 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant-motorist was not in custody when subjected to an ordinary traffic stop and, as such, his spontaneous admission that he was intoxicated was not subject to Miranda
  • holding that a defendant-motorist was not in custody for Miranda purposes when subject to an ordinary traffic stop, and not placed under arrest, forced to enter a police patrol car, subjected to coercion, or subject to prolonged questioning
  • holding defendant not in custody after he was directed to perform simple sobriety tests
  • the fact-finder may believe all, part or more of none of the evidence presented
  • defendant-motorist was not in custody when subject to an ordinary traffic stop and not placed under arrest, forced to enter a police patrol car, subjected to coercion, or subject to prolonged questioning
  • defendant-motorist was not in custody when subject to an ordinary traffic stop and not placed under arrest, forced to enter a police patrol car, subjected to coercion, or subject to prolonged questioning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Olszewski, Sole, Hudock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.