Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Bowen

Citations

  • 612 A.2d 512
  • 417 Pa. Super. 340
  • 1992 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the utilization of a sentencing enhancement concerns the trial court’s application of the sentencing guidelines, and therefore implicates the discretionary aspects of a defendant’s sentence
  • concluding the deadly weapon possessed enhancement should have been imposed because the defendant, while not possessing a firearm, had the firearm within his immediate physical control where his two accomplices had firearms and defendant had ready access to possessing it
  • trial court’s refusal to apply deadly weapon enhancement raised a substantial question for review
  • “the robbery here was found to be committed at gunpoint and as such would seem squarely to fall within the definition of section 3701(a)(1)(ii) as a first[-]degree felony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McEwen, Beck, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.