Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Lane

Citations

  • 81 A.3d 974
  • 2013 Pa. Super. 312
  • 2013 WL 6252518
  • 2013 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3190

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that any issues not raised in a Rule 1925(b) concise statement are waived on appeal
  • noting that any issues not raised in a Rule 1925(b) concise statement are waived on appeal
  • noting that any issues not raised in a Rule 1925(b) concise statement are waived on appeal
  • stating that this Court may sua sponte raise waiver under Pa.R.A.P. 1925
  • remanding for reinstatement of appellate rights nunc pro tunc where defendant was constructively denied his right to appeal by counsel’s failure to file Rule 1925(b) Statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gantman, Musmanno, Shogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.