Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Hilliard

Citations

  • 172 A.3d 5

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court cannot determine credibility at the preliminary hearing
  • stating, “the evidentiary sufficiency, or lack thereof, of the Commonwealth's prima facie case for a charged crime is a question of law”
  • finding the date order was filed on docket controlled appeal period, rather than date court issued order and mailed it to parties
  • addressing the Commonwealth’s burden of proof at the preliminary hearing stage
  • “Any conflicts or discrepancies in the evidence, which are questions regarding the weight and credibility of evidence, must be resolved by the fact-finder at trial.”
  • at preliminary hearing, evidence of each of material elements of crime charged must be considered in light most favorable to Commonwealth so that inferences that would support guilty verdict are given effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dubow, Solano, Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.