Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Rosado

Citations

  • 684 A.2d 605
  • 454 Pa. Super. 17
  • 1996 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3415

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • firing bullets into a window was sufficient to sustain a conviction despite fact that victims were unharmed
  • firing bullets into a window was sufficient to sustain a conviction despite fact that victims were unharmed
  • finding evidence sufficient where defendant fired into lighted second story windows of victim’s home
  • “The fact that the accused misapprehended the circumstances, thereby making it impossible for him to commit the crime undertaken, is not a defense to an attempt crime.”
  • “The fact that the accused misapprehended the circumstances, thereby making it impossible for him to commit the crime undertaken, is not a defense to an attempt crime.”
  • defendant’s act of firing shots into upper windows of building established intent to injure occupants, notwithstanding his assertions that he was unaware the victims used the second floor of their grocery business as their residence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cercone, Cavanaugh, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.