Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Rivera

Citations

  • 108 A.3d 779
  • 631 Pa. 67
  • 2014 Pa. LEXIS 3529

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that expert testimony on police procedures is unnecessary where counsel’s cross-examination conveyed the same information
  • noting majority of this Court determined weighing of mitigating circumstances is qualitative, not quantitative
  • noting majority of this Court determined weighing of mitigating circumstances is qualitative, not quantitative
  • stating Agurs as “holding that where the prosecution elicits false testimony that it knew or should have known was false, the defendant's conviction must be reversed if there is any reasonable likelihood that the false testimony could have affected the judgment of the jury.”
  • “[C]ounsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to raise a meritless claim.”
  • describing requirements for justification defenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baer, Castille, Eakin, Saylor, Stevens, Todd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.