Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 4/4/1985

Commonwealth v. Kendrick

Citations

490 A.2d 923
340 Pa. Super. 563
1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 6921

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that film container has other uses and therefore is not purely single-purpose container; however, given circumstances, trained narcotics detective's view of container was tantamount to view of narcotic itself
holding that film container has other uses ánd therefore is not purely single-purpose container; however, given circumstances, trained narcotics detective’s view of container was tantamount to view of narcotic itself
holding that probable cause “does not demand any showing that such a belief be correct or more likely true than false.”
“[Probable cause] does not demand any showing that such a belief be correct or more likely true than false.”
probable cause “does not demand any showing that ... a belief [of criminal activity] be correct or more likely true than false”
probable cause \does not demand any showing that . . . a belief [of criminal activity] be correct or more likely true than false\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rowley, Olszewski, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.