Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 8/3/1984
Commonwealth v. Chamberlain
Citations
- 480 A.2d 1209
- 332 Pa. Super. 108
- 1984 Pa. Super. LEXIS 5624
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that envelopes were recognizable as a common drug-packaging device
- where driver of automobile attempted to conceal weapon, Terry stop and frisk of both driver and companion upheld.
- Terry type of limited intrusion extends to companions of arrestee capable of accomplishing the harmful result
- manilla envelopes, which are commonly used for drug packaging, were properly seized when they were observed in \plain view\ during course of a protective Terry search
- the plain view doctrine is not an independent exception to the warrant requirement, but rather, it is an extension of whatever the prior justification for the officer’s access to the object may be
- warrantless search of manila envelopes held to be lawful
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rowley, Popovich, Cercone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. ElliottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-08-05· cited 75×
- Commonwealth v. MacKSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-07-11· cited 62×
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-08-16· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. KearneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-13· cited 54×
- Commonwealth v. AriondoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-08-31· cited 53×
- Commonwealth v. KendrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-04-04· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-07-24· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. MarconiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-08-23· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. BaerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-12-06· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. BowersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-12-11· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. KueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-04-22· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. DennisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-12-08· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. MorrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-11-25· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. SpeaksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-02-21· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-12-06· cited 22×
- In Interest of NlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-09-20· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. MallorySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-09-16· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-06-27· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-06-27· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. GrahamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-10-22· cited 18×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 3,269×
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 3,147×
- Illinois v. AndreasSupreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 626×
- United States v. Raymond J. BerryhillNinth Circuit· 1971-08-03· cited 137×
- Commonwealth v. TrengeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-10-01· cited 82×
- United States v. Ralph Donald TharpeFifth Circuit· 1976-08-13· cited 74×
- Commonwealth v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-12-21· cited 60×
- United States v. Alan Martin PomsFourth Circuit· 1973-09-26· cited 59×
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-06-05· cited 43×
- United States v. Victor Del ToroSecond Circuit· 1972-07-25· cited 36×
- Lewis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-03-15· cited 23×
- Commonwealth v. HookSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-04-15· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. ColliniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-02-23· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.