Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1/21/1999

Commonwealth v. Kelly

Citations

724 A.2d 909
555 Pa. 382
1999 Pa. LEXIS 122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that a presumption operates as proof of the ultimate fact unless and until the opposing party comes forward with evidence sufficient to rebut the presumption
recognizing that a presumption operates as proof of the ultimate fact unless and until the opposing party comes forward with evidence sufficient to rebut the presumption
instruction to jury that use of unlicensed firearm shall be evidence of intention to commit the crime described a mandatory presumption
instruction to jury that use of unlicensed firearm shall be evidence of intention to commit the crime described a mandatory presumption
in case of permissive inference, \the totality of evidence in the record other than the [inference] will be germane in an analysis of the [inference's] constitutional validity\
in case of permissive inference, “the totality of evidence in the record other than the [inference] will be germane in an analysis of the [inference’s] constitution al validity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Gappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.