Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2/21/2007

Commonwealth v. Judge

Citations

916 A.2d 511
591 Pa. 126
2007 Pa. LEXIS 385

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that allegation that Canada violated appellant’s rights under the International Covenant for Civil and Political Rights is not cognizable under the PCRA
holding that allegation that Canada violated appellant's rights under the International Covenant for Civil and Political Rights is not cognizable under the PCRA
observing that this Court may affirm the decision of the lower court on any proper ground that is supported by the record
observing that this Court may affirm the decision of the lower court on any proper ground that is supported by the record
holding, inter alia, that the appellant's claim under an international treaty was not cognizable under the PCRA and, therefore, could be raised in a petition for a writ of habeas corpus
noting, “the PCRA subsumes all forms of collateral relief, including habeas corpus, to the extent that a remedy is available under such enactment” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert Brett Dunham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Commonwealth v. Judge

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.