Wilson v. Plumstead Twp. Zoning Hearing Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming on different grounds Commonwealth Court’s denial of variance; Supreme Court held landowner failed to demonstrate unnecessary hardship and rejected this Court’s finding of self-inflicted hardship
• mere evidence that zoned use is less financially rewarding than proposed use is insufficient to justify a variance
• requested variance not required for reasonable use of property where landowner resided on property and operated his business as a permissible home occupation
• “[T]his Court may affirm on any ground”
• “[T]his Court may affirm on any ground”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).