Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 12/27/2007

Commonwealth v. West

Citations

938 A.2d 1034
595 Pa. 483
2007 Pa. LEXIS 2884

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that substantive due process challenge to continued validity of defendant's judgment of sentence after a nine-year delay is not cognizable under the PCRA
holding that substantive due process challenge to continued validity of defendant’s judgment of sentence after a nine-year delay is not cognizable under the PCRA
holding that substantive due process challenge to continued validity of defendant’s judgment of sentence after a nine-year delay is not cognizable under the PCRA
concluding that a challenge to the validity of defendant’s judgment of sentence after the Commonwealth delayed incarceration for nine years was not cognizable under the PCRA
holding that -7- J-S27013-16 substantive due process challenge to continued validity of defendant’s judgment of sentence after a nine-year delay is not cognizable under the PCRA
concluding that a challenge to the validity of West’s judgment of sentence after the Commonwealth delayed incarceration for nine years was not cognizable under the PCRA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cappy, Castille, Newman, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Baldwin, Former

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.