Commonwealth v. Grundza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding case and ordering suppression court make findings of fact and conclusions of law and file Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a) opinion
• remanding case and ordering suppression court make findings of fact and conclusions of law and file Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a) opinion
• appellate court does not in first instance make findings of fact
• “We note that the filing of a 1925(a) opinion is no substitute for the failure to make findings of fact and conclusions of law on the record at the conclusion of a suppression hearing in accordance with Pa.R.Crim.P. 581(I).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).