Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2/19/2015
Commonwealth v. Hollingshead
Citations
- 111 A.3d 186
- 2015 Pa. Super. 38
- 2015 Pa. Super. LEXIS 61
- 2015 WL 745709
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an expert’s diagnosis of hebephilia, which is not recognized in the DSM-5, is sufficient to support a finding of mental abnormality
- holding it would not disturb trial court’s decision to credit Commonwealth’s expert witness over defense expert witness on a challenge to the sufficiency of an SVP determination
- holding it would not disturb trial court’s decision to credit Commonwealth’s expert witness over defense expert witness on a challenge to the sufficiency of an SVP determination based on a hebephilia diagnosis
- finding that the defense expert’s focus on risk of recidivism was misplaced because proof of “the risk of re-offending is but one factor to be considered when making an assessment; it is not an independent element” (citation omitted)
- stating that we will not disturb the trial court’s credibility determination
- rejecting claim that defendant’s expert testimony proved she was not an SVP where trial court chose to believe the Commonwealth’s expert over the defendant’s expert, and this Court “may not disturb that credibility determination”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elliott, Panella, Olson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Com. v. Lawrence, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-03-27· cited 73×
- Com. v. Bankes, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-12-12· cited 64×
- People v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-10-24· cited 39×
- Com. v. Moore, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-12-01· cited 19×
- Com. v. Reyes, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-12-22· cited 1×
- Com. v. HollingsheadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-10-14
- Com. v. Aumick, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-02-23
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-06-27· cited 184×
- Commonwealth v. MealsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-12-27· cited 163×
- Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-10-30· cited 128×
- Commonwealth v. StephensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-07-11· cited 85×
- State v. Shannon S.New York Court of Appeals· 2012-10-30· cited 76×
- Commonwealth v. LeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-11-21· cited 70×
- United States v. CartaFirst Circuit· 2010-01-15· cited 47×
- Commonwealth v. MorganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-03-24· cited 39×
- United States v. Patrick CaporaleFourth Circuit· 2012-12-06· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. PlucinskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-01-28· cited 29×
- Interest of CormanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-04-29· cited 14×
- Texas State Board of Examiners of Marriage & Family Therapists v. Texas Medical Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2014-11-21· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.