Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 11/21/2007
Commonwealth v. Lee
Citations
- 935 A.2d 865
- 594 Pa. 266
- 2007 Pa. LEXIS 2436
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the registration policy is constitutional and not punitive
- stating recidivism rates of sexual offenders are 25 “sufficiently high to warrant careful record-keeping and continued supervision”
- defining obiter dictum as “[a] judicial comment made during, the course of delivering a judicial opinion, but one that is unnecessary to the decision in the case and therefore not precedential”
- defining obiter dictum judicial comment made during the course of delivering a judicial opinion, but one that is unnecessary to the decision in the case and therefore not (citation omitted
- defining dicta as “[a] judicial comment made during the course -3- J-S45012-14 of delivering a judicial opinion, but one that is unnecessary to the decision in the case and therefore not precedential.”
- observing in regard to adult sexual offenders that “[t]here is little question that the threat to public safety and the risk of recidivism among sex offenders is sufficiently high to warrant careful record- keeping and continued supervision.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cappy, Castille, Newman, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Baldwin, Former
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. Muniz, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-07-19· cited 899×
- Commonwealth v. ButlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-10-31· cited 372×
- Commonwealth v. LilleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-07-21· cited 304×
- Wallace v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 186×
- State v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court· 2008-10-01· cited 154×
- In the Interest of J.B.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-12-29· cited 152×
- Starkey v. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2013-06-25· cited 125×
- Commonwealth v. HollingsheadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-02-19· cited 104×
- Commonwealth v. PerezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-07-09· cited 103×
- Commonwealth v. LeidigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-09-24· cited 77×
- G.V. v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-04-29· cited 77×
- J. Taylor v. The PSP of the Commonwealth of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-01-12· cited 59×
- Com. v. Mickley, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-09-24· cited 45×
- Commonwealth v. HardySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-08-29· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. HorningSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-07-11· cited 38×
- Fross v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-05-25· cited 32×
- Com.. v. Moore, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-10-23· cited 29×
- A.S. v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-03-07· cited 26×
- Com. v. Haines, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-10-30· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. WilgusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-03-26· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.