Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Baker

Citations

  • 78 A.3d 1044
  • 621 Pa. 401
  • 2013 WL 5825252
  • 2013 Pa. LEXIS 2578

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • confining judicial review to Eighth Amendment principles governing sentence proportionality where appellant confined argument to federal constitutional principles and provided no separate analysis under state constitution
  • citations omitted, emphasis in original. In other words, not “every inaccuracy will justify an exclusion of evidence obtained as a result of the search.” Id. (citation omitted
  • every inaccuracy in an affidavit of probable cause does not justify exclusion of evidence; misstatements of fact will invalidate search warrant only if they are deliberate and material
  • 25-year mandatory minimum sentence for possession of child pornography not grossly disproportionate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baer, Castille, Eakin, McCaffery, Melvin, Saylor, Todd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.