Commonwealth v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant may challenge discretionary aspects of sentence on appeal where open guilty plea is entered
• holding that defendant may challenge discretionary aspects of a sentence on appeal where open guilty plea is entered
• holding that defendant may challenge discretionary aspects of sentence on appeal where open guilty plea is entered
• “If a court does not possess statutory authorization to impose a particular sentence, then the sentence is illegal and must be vacated.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Com. v. Morrobel, E.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-03-01· cited 19×
• Com. v. Marrero-Nardo, S., Sr.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-12-26

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gagnon v. Scarpelli
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
• Commonwealth v. Rhoades
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-11-12· cited 279×
• Commonwealth v. Ahmad
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-11-18· cited 258×
• Commonwealth v. Ritchey
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-07-02· cited 135×
• Commonwealth v. Kelly
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-12-02· cited 98×
• Commonwealth v. Heilman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-06-01· cited 43×
• Commonwealth v. Catt
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-05-10· cited 35×
• Commonwealth v. Wilson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-12-15· cited 23×
• Commonwealth v. Pinko
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-10-22· cited 16×
• Ebo v. Preferred Party Rentals, LLC
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-07-26· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Arest
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-07-08· cited 13×
• Sealed v. Sealed
  Supreme Court· 2012-03-19· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Borrin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-06-21· cited 2×