Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 6/1/2005
Commonwealth v. Heilman
Citations
- 876 A.2d 1021
- 2005 Pa. Super. 202
- 2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1358
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that insufficient evidence appeared in the record of the hearing providing a basis for a finding that the appellant willfully disregarded the terms of his probation
- determining that the evidence was insufficient to establish probation violation because the Commonwealth presented no witnesses and relied upon the defendant’s testimony and unsworn comments of the prosecutor and probation officer
- finding argument raised in support of claim in appellant’s brief that differed from the issue raised in his 1925(b) statement to be waived
- “[A] tacit or implied waiver of a constitutional right is simply insufficient. . . . Moreover, there can be no legitimate argument made that the [hearing in question] satisfied the requirements of Gagnon II.”
- “[A] tacit or implied waiver of a constitutional right is simply insufficient.”
- “[A] tacit or implied waiver of a constitutional right is simply insufficient.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bender, Montemuro, Panella
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. CartretteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-12-24· cited 1,101×
- Commonwealth v. InfanteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-03-06· cited 262×
- Commonwealth v. HillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-04-10· cited 98×
- Commonwealth v. AllshouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-03-19· cited 81×
- Com. v. Lee, N.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-07-27· cited 6×
- Com. v. Campbell, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-12-27
- Com. v. Potoczny, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2026-04-23
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-10-28· cited 1,456×
- Commonwealth v. CappelliniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-03-10· cited 80×
- Commonwealth v. SimsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-03-05· cited 70×
- Commonwealth v. HoutzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-07-28· cited 55×
- Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-02-08· cited 51×
- Commonwealth v. Del ConteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-05-16· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. BallardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-01-06· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. HottingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-12-08· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. SwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-09-12· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-06-10· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.