Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Heilman

Citations

  • 876 A.2d 1021
  • 2005 Pa. Super. 202
  • 2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1358

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that insufficient evidence appeared in the record of the hearing providing a basis for a finding that the appellant willfully disregarded the terms of his probation
  • determining that the evidence was insufficient to establish probation violation because the Commonwealth presented no witnesses and relied upon the defendant’s testimony and unsworn comments of the prosecutor and probation officer
  • finding argument raised in support of claim in appellant’s brief that differed from the issue raised in his 1925(b) statement to be waived
  • “[A] tacit or implied waiver of a constitutional right is simply insufficient. . . . Moreover, there can be no legitimate argument made that the [hearing in question] satisfied the requirements of Gagnon II.”
  • “[A] tacit or implied waiver of a constitutional right is simply insufficient.”
  • “[A] tacit or implied waiver of a constitutional right is simply insufficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Montemuro, Panella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.