Commonwealth v. Catt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding: a claim that the trial court “erred when it sentenced [the defendant] as a second-time [DUI] offender” implicated the legality of the defendant’s sentence
• holding a claim that implicates the fundamental legal authority of the court to impose a particular sentence constitutes a challenge to the legality of the sentence
• a claim that the trial court “erred when it sentenced [the defendant] as a second-time [DUI] offender” implicated the legality of the defendant’s sentence
• “[w]hen the legality of a sentence is at issue on appeal, our standard of review is de novo and our scope of review is plenary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).