Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Scott

Citations

  • 597 A.2d 1220
  • 409 Pa. Super. 313
  • 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3154

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court’s conclusion that defendant’s testimony was “self-serving” no substitute for proof
  • establishing that a conviction cannot be based purely on “conjecture and speculation”
  • overturning arson and risking catastrophe convictions where there was no proof that defendant wanted to cause a fire when the evidence was that she squirted lighter fluid at her boyfriend during a fight and left the room
  • in conviction for arson, circumstantial evidence of defendant’s being at premises before fire and squirting lighter fluid on boyfriend insufficient evidence to support conviction
  • “The trier of fact cannot base a conviction on conjecture and speculation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, Beck, Hudock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.