Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 11/5/1981
Commonwealth v. Henderson
Citations
- 437 A.2d 387
- 496 Pa. 349
- 1981 Pa. LEXIS 1025
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- United States Supreme Court’s interpretation of federal constitution did not and could not disturb force of Pennsylvania’s interested-adult rule
- United States Supreme Court's interpretation of federal constitution did not and could not disturb force of Pennsylvania's interested-adult rule
- interested-adult rule protecting minors from self-incrimination has its foundation in state law
- interested-adult rule protecting minors from self-incrimination has its foundation in state law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaherty, Kauffman, Larsen, Nix, O'Brien, Roberts, Wilkinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. SimonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-03-11· cited 64×
- Corra v. CollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-10-01· cited 63×
- Commonwealth v. HernandezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-06-29· cited 57×
- Commonwealth v. BeaverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-15· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. CarrollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-07-02· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. PeterfieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-05-14· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. BarrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-31· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. CarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-03· cited 7×
- Commonwealth v. PritchettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-10-14· cited 5×
- Commonwealth v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-23· cited 2×
- Commonwealth v. TrussSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-08-06· cited 2×
- Commonwealth v. PazSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-05-06· cited 2×
- In the Interest of DoeHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1998-06-04· cited 1×
- Commonwealth v. RobersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-02-24· cited 1×
Cites
65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 3,002×
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-02-24· cited 2,903×
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 1,729×
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-02-20· cited 1,583×
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court· 1975-03-19· cited 1,364×
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 1,093×
- Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 1,005×
- Cox v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 419×
- Herb v. PitcairnSupreme Court· 1945-02-05· cited 282×
- Lewis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1972-10-19· cited 175×
- Commonwealth v. McCutchenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-07-07· cited 165×
- State in Interest of DinoSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1978-05-08· cited 164×
- Commonwealth v. TriplettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-05-13· cited 139×
- William Goldman Theatres, Inc. v. DanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1961-07-26· cited 121×
- Commonwealth v. PlatouSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-11-26· cited 113×
- Commonwealth v. TateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-07-14· cited 111×
- Commonwealth v. RoaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-11-20· cited 105×
- Commonwealth v. WebsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-03· cited 102×
- J. T. P v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1975-12-30· cited 102×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.