Skip to main content
· 10/1/1982

Corra v. Coll

Citations

  • 451 A.2d 480
  • 305 Pa. Super. 179
  • 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 5349

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding paternity decisions implicate important privacy interests that require certain procedural due process safeguards, such as the right to appointed counsel
  • familial, liberty and property interests at stake in a paternity proceeding are significant enough to warrant protection through appointment of counsel for indigent defendants in paternity actions
  • in a support action the court held that the impact of a determination of paternity on familial, liberty and property interests justifies the right to the appointment of counsel
  • in a support action the court held that the impact of a determination of paternity on familial, liberty and property interests justifies the right to the appointment of counsel
  • indigent defendant must be appointed counsel in a proceeding to establish paternity
  • Indigent defendants in civil paternity actions have a constitutional right to appointed counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hester, Cavanaugh, Van Voort

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.