Commonwealth v. Swartz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to quash appeal because no hearing had been held before the court denied Swartz’s speedy trial motion and instead vacating the order and remanding for the court to conduct a hearing
• “Without . . . a hearing, appellant’s right to a speedy trial will not be adequately protected in a post-trial review on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Heilman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-06-01· cited 43×
• Commonwealth v. Jackson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-04-30· cited 37×
• Commonwealth v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-01-06· cited 33×
• Commonwealth v. Rosario
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-10-27· cited 17×
• Commonwealth v. McGeth
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-02-02· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Anderson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-08-20· cited 14×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pugar v. Greco
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-11-18· cited 308×
• Commonwealth v. Bolden
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-04-28· cited 259×
• Commonwealth v. Myers
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-07-01· cited 51×
• Commonwealth v. Bunter
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-10-12· cited 34×
• Commonwealth v. Reagan
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-08-03· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. Swanson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-01-04· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Mancuso
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-03-31· cited 12×