Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 8/19/1998

Commonwealth v. Hawkins

Citations

718 A.2d 265
553 Pa. 76

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that defendant lacked legitimate expectation of privacy relative to drugs seized from another person
explaining that subsequent decisions of this Court require defendants to prove “a legitimate expectation of privacy” to prevail in the suppression context under the federal and state constitutions
explaining that subsequent decisions of this Court require defendants to prove “a legitimate expectation of privacy” to prevail in the suppression context under the federal and state constitutions
maintaining, under Article I, Section 8, a bar on derivative standing, consistent with federal Fourth Amendment jurisprudence
applying Edmunds analysis to Article I, Section 8 claim that criminal defendants \should be able to vicariously assert privacy interests belonging to others in order to challenge allegedly intrusive police conduct\
maintaining a bar on derivative standing, a doctrine that would have allowed a defendant to vicariously assert the constitutional privacy interests belonging to another in a suppression motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.