Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Hart

Citations

  • 565 A.2d 1212
  • 388 Pa. Super. 484
  • 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3334

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • whether a defendant acted under “heat of passion” or “unreasonable belief’ is implicit in the question of whether the malice element necessary for a murder conviction has been established
  • “[A]s a general rule, a progression charge is proper where the defendant is charged with different forms or degrees of the same crime.”
  • \we find that a improper\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sole, Beck, Montgomery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.