Supreme Court of Connecticut· 5/22/2001

State v. Tate

Citations

256 Conn. 262
773 A.2d 308
2001 Conn. LEXIS 131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding there was no manifest necessity to declare mistrial because the trial court failed to inquire whether jurors had reached a partial verdict
discussing jurisdictions permitting a court to take a partial verdict of acquittal on a greater offense when the jury is deadlocked on the lesser offenses
partial verdicts appropriate because of “hard transition” approach to deliberations, recognizing that partial verdicts are problematic in jurisdictions that have adopted “soft transition” approach
“[t]his approach makes Connecticut what is termed a ‘hard transition’ acquittal first jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Katz, Norcott, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

77 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.