· 12/29/1995
Commonwealth v. Sneeringer
Citations
- 668 A.2d 1167
- 447 Pa. Super. 241
- 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4091
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- murder victim’s statements concerning the breakdown of her relationship with defendant relevant as to motive and admissible under the “state of mind” hearsay exception
- murder victim's statements concerning the breakdown of her relationship with defendant relevant as to motive and admissible under the \state of mind\ hearsay exception
- “[a]s a general rule, [the Superior] Court has held that a progression charge is proper where a defendant is charged with different forms or degrees of the same crime”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cavanaugh, Beck and Hester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.